| Consultant Services | People | Business & Investment Articles | Business & Investment Property Development  | Handicrafts |


Return to VVG's Home Page

VVG - VIETNAM VENTURE GROUP, Inc.

Economic Indicators

Copyright © 1999 - 1997-2008 Venture Group, Inc.®    Updated  June 1, 2002

This space provides the latest data that is available to us on key financial indicators.  This is for the most part the official government picture on the economic climate in Vietnam.   Please read this data in conjunction with Vietnam Vignettes ,  the various Business Articles , and our Service pages in order to learn more about Vietnam and V V G.  Please write to us  with your business-related questions when you consider a project in Vietnam and want to know more about us.

June 2002

Current Report Of Vietnam's Economic Indicators

Rates of Inflation, Exchange, and Debt
Balance of Trade
Growth Rate of Merchandise Exports
Changes in Consumer Prices
GDP Growth (%)
GDP (converted to US$)
GDP per capita (converted to US$)
Foreign Capital Investment
Foreign Investment By Sector
Foreign Investment By Province

Current as of  the month reported, data sources include VVG original research,  General Statistical Office, MPI, International Herald Tribune, Vietnam Investment Review, Saigon Times Weekly, and Vietnam Economic Times.  Determining accuracy in these reported numbers is akin to reading tea leaves and is really anyone's guess, as the system lacks transparency.

Prior  On-Line Issues Of
V V G ~ Economic Indicators
January 2002
| February 2002 | March 2002 | April 2002 | May 2002 

October 1998 through December 2001

 

VVG ~ Web Site Search

Google
WWW http://www.vvg-vietnam.com

Rates of Inflation & Currency Exchange

Current Annual Rate of Inflation: 0.78 (ytd 2002) First Quarter Rate of Inflation: 2.35 [Chart VET May 2002]   NOTE:  2001 was  the second year running in which negative numbers for 8 consecutive months were recorded.  The year 2000 ended in negative numbers only having modest positive numbers in the first quarter.   Generally, a drop of two consecutive quarters in the rate of inflation is the signal of recession. By way of historical reference, in 1986 and the start of the "Doi Moi" or "renovation" program, inflation stood at 774.7%.  By 1995 that rate had dropped to 12.7%. See prior reports  or above for a more complete, historical picture

The IMF claims annual inflation in 2001 was +0.8%, up from the -1.8% it found in 2000. Note that Vietnam's GSO does not always agree with international observers. The State, when it can, generally quotes those numbers if finds most favorable.

Current and Recent monthly rates of inflation:

January 2002 February 2002 March 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002
1.1 3.3 2.5 2.5 - -

 

July 2001 August 2001 September 2001 October 2001 November 2001 December 2001
- 0.9 - 0.9 - 0.4 - 0.4 - 0.2 0.8
January 2001 February 2001 March 2001 April 2001 May 2001 June 2001
0.3 0.4 0.0 - 0.5 - 0.7 - 0.7
July 2000 August 2000 September 2000 October 2000 November 2000 December 2000
-1.6 -1.5 -1.7 -1.6 - 0.7 - 0.6

Historical annual rates of inflation:

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
14.4 12.7 4.5 3.8 9.2 0.7 - 0.5 - 0.3

Current Rate of Exchange (exchanging cash in new bills denominated in $100 or $50 only)
US dollar to Vietnam dong  1 : 15,248 (NhanDan-15May02) The black market rate: buying 100 and 50 US dollar notes for approximately 250 VND/US$ more, and selling dollars for
350 VND/US$ more, than the quoted official rate.

[Unofficial projections have been running that this will drop to below 16,000, a target that appears fast approaching. The relatively recent introduction of the VND 100,000 "brown" note worth US$6.56 at the current exchange rate, will ease, if not speed, the rate of spending. When we first arrived in January 1994 the then very new VND 20,000 "green" note was then worth US$1.90 and is now worth $1.31].

Outstanding External Debt in US$ millions (ADB): 1997 - 11,612;  1998 - 14,861; 1999 - n/a; 2000 - n/a

Index                                                                                                  

 

 

Balance of Trade 1 US$ billions (VET May 2002 and other public reports)
Note: All publications in Vietnam are subject to strict State censorship and State propagandizing.  The numbers reported here are not always consistent with those from other services.  When we are aware of substantial discrepancies, we mention them.  We also pass on any explanation that is offered, which is very rare

Because changes are so frequent and unsubstantiated, we encourage readers to refer to prior reports on line  for such historic details as they may need.  This is the most current and best data available from public sources, even though the accuracy of all these numbers is anyone's guess.

20025 20013 & 4 20002 1999  1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
Exports 5.88 16.74 13.06/14.31 11.9 9.4 8.9 7.1 5.2 4.1
Imports 6.85 17.70 14.63/15.2 12.01 11.4 11.2 11.1 7.5 5.3
Balance  - 0.97 - 1.0 - 1.6 - 0.2 - 2.0 - 2.3 - 4.0 - 2.3 - 1.2

1.  Adding to the wealth of the nation that is not reflected in these number are (a) annual currency transfers from overseas Vietnamese adds an estimated $2.5 billion into the quiet economy, while smuggling adds approximately $1.5 billion more each year. These sums are not accounted for in this tabulation of only official reports. Recent reports indicate a decline in this number in 2001, and (b) Official Development Assistance ()DA) disbursements in 2001 that are reported at $1.7 billion

2. Year 2000  [VET January 2001]. Numbers in blue are from Vietnam's GSO

3. Full year (VET). 

4. The MPI through its media organ the VIR, reported different numbers.   In issue 529 published 3-9 December 2001,  November exports of $1.1 billion are claimed to bring total exports for the year to $13.8 billion, lower then the shorter period  reported by VET. VIR reports total imports grew $1.3 billion for November for a total of $14.5 billion, also substantially lower  than the sum reported by VET a month earlier. However, the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) claims year 2001 exports were US$ 15.1 billion (547VIR1, 8-14Apr02).

5. First five months of current year. (STW 1Jun02)

Index

 

Growth Rate of Merchandise Exports as a percent of change from the prior year (ADB)

2001 2000 (e) 1999  1998 1997
n/a 6.9 4.5 3.9 22.2

 

Change in Consumer Prices expressed as a percent of change from the prior year (ADB)

2001 2000 (e) 1999 1998 1997
n/a 7.0 4.0 9.2 3.6

GDP Growth (%) Government Statistics Bureau/ADB/IMF

2010 (f) 2002 (e) 20011 2000  1999  1998 1997 1996 1995
double year 2000 7.12 7.1/ 7.0/4.75 6.75/5.5 4.8  5.8 / 4.0 8.8 / 8.2 9.34 9.54

1. The State reduced this figure from 7.5 to 7.1 in October 2001, which the World Bank supports.

2. First Quarter 2002 : 6.6% (VET April 2002)

Index

 

GDP (converted to US$ billion)   VND 1 = US$  15,000* (constant) Reported in billion dollars

2000 1999  1998 1997 1996 1995
28.19 26.41 26 24.27 21.65 14.86

* We caution readers that these numbers were previously converted at 1 US$ to 14,000 VND as a constant.

Index

 

GDP per capita (converted to US$)  VND 1 = US$  15,0001 (constant) 

2001 2000 1999  1998 1997 1996 1995
400-2,0003 387 2 362  332  315  301 214

1 We caution readers that these numbers were previously converted at 1 US$ to 14,000 VND as a constant.

2 This number is derived by taking the most recently announced GDP for year 2000 of US$30.6 billion and dividing by the estimated total population of 79 million. The reports of Vietnam's per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) are all over the mark.  VBJ, an early source of our numbers (in blue), is no longer published.  While VET has been reporting that the GDP per capita was at and above US$ 301 since 1996, Vietnam Investment Review in mid-year 20000 - a publication of the MPI - reports "the average income [broke] $250 a year for the first time....  Monthly income per person reached VND 295,000 ($21.07) in 1999, a 30.1 per cent increase on 1996 and equivalent to an annual $252.86" (455 VIR 4, 3-9 July 2000).  VIR cites figures from the General Statistics Department of Vietnam.  The actual number is as elusive as are most official numbers in Vietnam and will remain so until Vietnam's reporting becomes transparent. However, as the GDP numbers are substantially under those of the "news" media, we suspect the GDP numbers are the more accurate.

3. It is claimed (VIR, Jan 2002 p10) that this reported range is determined under the Parity Purchase Power method (PPM).  No explanation is offered if this is the same as the United Nation's Purchase Power Parity (PPP) system, designed "to show the different levels of spending power on a country by country basis. A market basket of such items as average incomes, taxes, interest rates, insurance, utilities, gasoline, milk, newspapers and other typical expenses are compared and used to devise the PPP. The standard is based on the USA=100," or who the PPP is now made into a range and used by the State to report GDP.  For a more complete read on the PPP system developed by the United Nations, please write to VVG to receive a copy by E-mail.

Index

 

Foreign Capital Investment 

Caveat: All publications in Vietnam are subject to strict State censorship and State propagandizing.  The numbers reported here change dramatically from time-to-time. The numbers of projects seem to decrease or increase without regard to the value of the projects or the steel in the ground. There is rarely an explanation offered. 

Because the changes are so frequent and unsubstantiated, we encourage readers to refer to prior reports on line  or above for such historic details as they may need.  This is the most current and best data available from public sources, even though the accuracy of all these numbers is anyone's guess.

These numbers do not include ODA disbursements that in 2001 amounted to $1.7 billion and usually go towards infrastructure development.

As of April 20, 2002 (May 2002 by VET)

All Nations: Current projects number 3,198 vs. 3,174 last report]  with Total Investment Capital $38,195 billion [vs. $38,094 billion last report] and Implemented Capital of $19.6641 billion [vs. $20,838 billion last month and $18.632 billion in the prior month]. 

Where the numbers increased or decreased month-on-month, we've added a corresponding +/- respectively. Where no change is reported, no symbol follows the number.  We have no explanations for the changes but invite readers to review the previous month's Economic Indicators for further research. Determining accuracy in these reported numbers is akin to reading tea leaves as the system lacks transparency.

Top Twenty Nations : 

Rank

Nation

Number of
Projects
Total Capital (US$b) Implemented Capital (US$b)

Rank

Nation

Number of
Projects
Total Capital (US$b) Implemented Capital2 (US$b)
1 Singapore 247 6.898+ 2.198 - 11 Thailand  101+ 1.099+ 0.519 -
2 Taiwan 797+ 5.212+ 2.622 - 12 Malaysia 99 - 1.056 - 1.073 -
3  Japan 336 - 4.075 - 3.003 - 13 United States 140+ 1.064+ 0.496 -
4 South Korea 384+ 3.330+ 2.076 - 14 Australia 71 - 0.766 - 0.540 -
5 Hong Kong 225+  2.805+ 1.656 - 15 Switzerland 24 0.541+ 0.501+ 
6 France 115 - 2.038 - 0.735 - 16 Cayman Is. 9 0.449 0.319 -
7 Br. Virgin Islands 136+ 1.739+ 0.891 - 17 Germany 38 0.349 - 0.119
8 Netherlands 43+ 1.667 0.638+ 18 Sweden 8 0.454+ 0.101
9 Russia 40+ 1.505+ 0.514+ 19 Bermuda 5 0.260 0.148 -
10 U.K. 34+ 1.141+ 0.865 20 Philippines 21 0.252 0.092

Notes:

1. As reported for the last three months, there seems to be substantial fiddling with the Total Implemented Capital.  While most if not all financial reports from the State have always been considered overstated, recent undisguised errors (see EI for March 2002 and EI for April 2002) and a more recent report from Korea (see VV for May 2002) show the questionable nature of these financial reports from Vietnam. Clearly the nation needs transparency in reporting (that means access to accurate -- both current and historical -- numbers as well as accountability in reporting) to attract more substantial western investors and projects to Vietnam. 

2. Total Implemented Capital in the China Ag sector for Bac Ninh Province saw the most dramatic change in earlier months as reported in Note 1, immediately above. This month there appears to have been near universal reduction in Total Implemented Capital in spite of reported growth in the number of projects.  Other sources point to a down turn in overall FDI for the first quarter of 2002 over last year.

Index

 

Foreign Investment By Sector  Total Foreign Investment by Sector (US$) 1

Caveat: As above in Foreign Capital Investment, these numbers are the best available and are published by State controlled media. For the reasons earlier stated, they are highly suspect.  We encourage readers to review archived monthly reports as they may have the need to review the accuracy of reporting. 

Where the numbers increased or decreased month-on-month, we've added a corresponding +/- respectively. Where no change is reported, no symbol follows the number.  We have no explanations for the changes but invite readers to review the previous month Economic Indicators for further research.  

As of  April 20, 2002 (May 2002 VET)    

Sector

Total Projects Total Invested (US$b) Total Implemented2 (US$b)
Industry & Construction 2,108+ 21.118 - 12.438 -
    Oil & Gas 30 3.206+ 3.109+
    Construction 204 - 3.133 - 1.841 -
Agriculture & Forestry 323 - 1.988 - 1.134+
    Fisheries 70+ 0.195+ 0.102 -
Services 503+ 14.174+ 5.782 -
    Banking and Finance 47 0.547 0.517 -
    Health and Education 111+ 0.556 -  0.173 -
    Offices and Apartments 110 3.662 -  1.693 -
    Building New Urban Areas 3 2.467 0.400
    IPZ & EPZ Infrastructure 15 0.807+ 0.468 -
    Transport & Telecom 97 2.884+ 0.959+
    Hotels & Tourism 120+ 3.251+ 1.972 -
Others 194+ 0.720+ 0.208+

Notes:

1. As reported for the last three months, there seems to be substantial fiddling with the Sector Investments.  While most if not all financial reports from the State have always been considered overstated, recent undisguised errors (see EI for March 2002 and EI for April 2002) and a more recent report from Korea (see VV for May 2002) show the questionable nature of these financial reports from Vietnam. Clearly the nation needs transparency in reporting (that means access to accurate -- both current and historical -- numbers as well as accountability in reporting) to attract more substantial western investors and projects to Vietnam. 

2. Total Implemented Capital in the China Ag sector for Bac Ninh Province saw the most dramatic change in earlier months as reported in Note 1, immediately above. This month there appears to have been near universal reduction in Total Implemented Capital in spite of reported growth in the number of projects.  Other sources point to a down turn in overall FDI for the first quarter of 2002 over last year.

Index

 Foreign Investment By Province:  

Caveat
Accurate investment figures are not readily available, and when published, they lack transparency. There is no logical reason for apparent reporting discrepancies.  Starting in September 2000, the State again reported on Implemented Capital, earlier called Capital Committed .  Estimates of this number differ among multinational institutions but currently run at between $4 billion to $8 billion, or from 25% to 50% of the official government statistics offered here. 

The numbers here vary substantially from month to month. Sometimes the number of projects and capital increase but implemented capital decreases. The reverse also happens. There is no explanation offered.

Where the following numbers increased or decreased month-on-month, we've added a corresponding +/- respectively. Where no change is reported, no symbol follows the number.  We have no explanations for the changes but encourage readers to review prior reports on line as they may have the need for historical accuracy.

Top Twenty Locations by Total Capital1 As of April  20, 2002 (VET May 2001) 

Province

Number of Projects 2002

Total
Number of Projects 

Total Capital
(US$ b) 

Total Implemented2 Capital (US$b)
1 HCMC 55+ 1,095+ 10.216 - 5.088 -
2 Hanoi 10+ 408+ 7.802+ 2.977 -
3 Dong Nai 17+ 331 - 5.185 - 2.371 -
4 Binh Duong 26+ 510+ 2.623+ 1.419+
5 BaRia-Vung Tau 7+ 75+ 1.822 - 0.392 -
6 Quang Ngai 0 5 1.326 0.450
7 Hai Phong 13+ 106 1.297+ 0.988 -
8 Lam Dong 2+ 52 0.845+ 0.117+
9 Ha Tay 5 33 0.427+ 0.210 -
10 Hai Duong 2+ 34+ 0.4942+ 0.133
11 Thanh Hoa 0 7 0.443 0.410
12 Kien Giang 0 5 0.392 0.394
13 DaNang 0 40 0.200+ 0.132 -
14 Quang Ninh 2+ 38 0.254+ 0.171
15 Khanh Hoa 4+ 43+ 0.349+ 0.271 -
16 Long An 5+ 50+ 0.329+ 0.201 -
17 Vinh Phuc 2 26 0.341 0.237 -
18 Nghe An 0 9 .0.231 0.040
19 Tay Ninh 3+ 41 - 0.209 - 0.160+
20 Bac Ninh 2+ 11+ 0.154+ 0.131 -

Notes:

1. As reported for the last three months, there seems to be substantial fiddling with the Investments by Province numbers  While most if not all financial reports from the State have always been considered overstated, recent undisguised errors (see EI for March 2002 and EI for April 2002) and a more recent report from Korea (see VV for May 2002) show the questionable nature of these financial reports from Vietnam. This month the errors are less apparent but more in number as in many locations the year to date new projects increase where the total project hold fast or in several cases drop. Clearly the nation needs transparency in reporting (that means access to accurate -- both current and historical -- numbers as well as accountability in reporting) to attract more substantial western investors and projects to Vietnam. 

2. Total Implemented Capital in the China Ag sector for Bac Ninh Province saw the most dramatic change in earlier months as reported in Note 1, immediately above. This month there appears to have been near universal reduction in Total Implemented Capital in spite of reported growth in the number of projects.  Other sources point to a down turn in overall FDI for the first quarter of 2002 over last year.

Index


Economic Archives | Newsletter | Services | People | Southeast Asian Handicrafts  Articles | Property Development | FAQ

Write to us | or locate Our Offices